Tango-Tiger

Leading environmental groups have joined the call from protesters digging a tunnel under London's Euston station to review HS2 amid the epidemic.The high-speed rail line is planned to handle the growing number of passengers over the next several decades. But experts predict the work-at-home revolution could permanently reduce travel demand in the UK.Now, the government says, the main reason is that HS2 is part of a long-term infrastructure plan that supports future needs.But the head of the Department of Transportation admitted that he had no idea about future travel patterns or the number of passengers.Opponents of the project, a high-speed train linking London, Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds fear that construction emissions will outweigh the carbon savings over decades.They are also angry about the damage to ancient wildlife and forests. Tom Burke, one of the founders of the UK Green Movement, described the train as a "20th Century Project for the 21st Century".

Congress initially approved the HS2 in 2016, but the สล็อตออนไลน์ political opposition has not disappeared and the railroad's environmental case is under scrutiny in Westminster.Caroline Lucas Green Party MPs said the HS2 is not an investment in a greener future, but a "nonsense project that is devastating and needs to be stopped before it can cause further damage".Commons Public Accounts Committee recently pressed senior commissioner of transportation department Bernadette Kelly on passenger projections.Chesham and Amersham MP Dame Cheryl Gillan, one of HS2's most furious critics, questioned whether the costs would be reasonable when "You are not stipulating that future use of public transport will be at such a level that this railway will function in any way. A shape or a pattern?


Long-term benefits

In response, Ms Kelly said the business case had been closely investigated before Boris Johnson gave it to last year.HS2 is not a project about the next five or 10 years,” she said. “It is a project that we expect to continue delivering to passengers in 100 years and 150 years. It's very long and is a long-term investment in future infrastructure and future economic activities. That is the driving factor.Dame Cheryl asked if passengers were recently visiting again - a year in the outbreak.As I hoped otherwise, we didn't know what it would be like in six months or six years," Ms Kelly said.A government spokesperson told BBC News that the railways business case covered high and low demand forecasts.But at the time of writing, the government has not insisted that the low forecasts include the possibility of zero growth, a concept that was hard to imagine last year.

Laborer Lord Adonis, who was awarded the ongoing HS2 program while in government, said:HS2 is the dominant green unless you see that we shouldn't have the extra transport infrastructure it used to be.All large infrastructure projects attract protesters because the rail has to go somewhere, in the case of railways and HS2, there are fewer protesters than you would get from large infrastructure projects like Heathrow or indirectly, let alone installation. Nuclear and that's because it's green The movement itself is divided on many green rails into pro rails.Lillian Greenwood Nottingham South's Labor MP and former commons transportation committee chair said if Britain wanted to avoid In "car recovery" from the epidemic, it is necessary to invest in alternatives.When restrictions are imposed, people are no doubt wanting to visit family and friends, go to university, go on vacation and return to work," she said.


'Been waiting for decades'

Business groups in the north of England have also called for government pressure.We have been waiting decades for this investment," Tim Wood, director of Northern Powerhouse Rail, which plans to expand the rail in the north with HS2.Connecting will mean larger businesses from the South to the North, creating much better job opportunities. The outbreak will not be here forever. We are very confident that the number of passengers will return.But the outbreak has provided fresh ammunition to long-term critics of the project, such as the Taxpayers Alliance, who say there is controversy over the empowerment of the rail "no more water".And the left-leaning IPPR thinks the tank, formerly a notorious supporter of the HS2, believes the government should now pause and recheck the economics.Company spokesman Luke Murphy said: "With significant public investment, it is right that governments should monitor and assess how long-term trends may affect the value of the project.Tom Burke of think tank E3G confessed that he had changed his mind with HS2.