Tango-Tiger

The fun of cybercrime wreaking havoc around the world has urged governments to ban ransom payments to hackers.Ransomware criminals take computer systems hostage on a daily basis, demanding large sums of money from victims to restore order.The CEO of Colonial Pipeline admitted his company paid hackers nearly $ 4.5 million last week after their attack forced the company to stop shipping fuel.But research from Bitcoin Elliptic analysts suggests this is just a drop in the ocean.Since August, the hackers responsible for DarkSide have made at least $ 90 million in ransom on 47 victims.And DarkSide is just one of at least a dozen prolific ransomware gangs making huge profits from holding companies, government schools and hospitals to ransom.They work anonymously so they are hard to keep up with.And many operate in countries that do not want to arrest them.


Law enforcement agencies

Ransomware attacks prevent victims from สล็อต gaining access to computer systems or data until a ransom has been paid.Law enforcement agencies around the world urge victims not to pay more.But paying the ransom is not illegal.And many organizations are paying confidentiality.Ransomware's Global Cyber ​​Expert Alliance (RTF) is now lobbying governments to take action.Has provided nearly 50 tips to reduce the joy of crime. But it could not be agreed whether countries should ban the payment of the ransom.And we asked the two members why Paying bans will result in a horrible' chicken game.Most people agree,” said Jen Ellis, vice president of community and public affairs at Rapid7, “government will forbid the payment of the ransom.As ransomware is a profitable crime, it is hoped that it will completely exclude crime.And no one will have to face crime funding.The problem is that we are not in the ideal world.In the world we live in, banning payments will almost certainly result in a horrible 'chicken' game,

with criminals turning all their attention to organizations that are least likely to be able to cope with downtime. Got like a hospital Water treatment plants, energy service providers, and schools Hackers may expect the harm to society caused by this downtime to apply the necessary pressure to ensure they get paid.They pay very little by doing this - and it can be a big payday.Let's say the government creates funds to support these organizations so they don't have to pay them.If that's the case, attackers can shift their focus to small businesses and nonprofits that don't have the resources to protect themselves.They might face total destruction if they don't pay.In the face of a declaration of bankruptcy, these organizations may consider secrecy payments that will make them even greater at the mercy of criminals, who may threaten to go public.Overcoming these problems is not straightforward.It takes time, education and sustainable investment.Prohibiting payments is a great target for shooting.But we need to take action to ensure that we don't cause significant economic and social harm.


'Banning payments may ease the burden'

Cyber ​​Threat Alliance Chairman and Chief Executive Michael Daniel said: “The ban on the payment of the ransom is clear.Ransomware attacks are primarily profit motive.And if it's not for profit, attackers will switch away from this strategy.Ransom profits are also used to finance other more dangerous crimes, such as human trafficking, child exploitation and terrorism.Ultimately, the payments trigger more attacks, reinforcing the strategy's utility.No organization wants to pay the ransom.But they feel they have no choice, whether because of the threat of bankruptcy, reputational damage, or the possibility of loss of life or an economic disruption in the country. Wide circle In fact, from a purely short-term corporate perspective, paying the ransom is often an economically rational decision. We need to break this cycle and discourage the 'fuel' ransomware ecosystem.A payment ban will reduce the burden on organizations by removing payments legally."As a result, well-designed taboos provide targeted organizations with the benefit of pushing attackers.Such prohibitions should not be taken immediately.In fact, the ban should only come after the government has established an effective aid mechanism for victims.The payment prohibition should be part of a broader campaign to improve prevention, deterrence, disruption and response."